Friday, 13 September 2013

Summary of case

To All Australian.
This is indisputable evidence showing how corrupt Judge Nicholas and Mr J Sackar were in our case.
in Judge J Sackar and Judge R. Nicholas
I was involved with the two in the case 5840/92  
(1)   Initial hearing 5840/92 followed by two Appeals
(2)   Appeal Court 40442/05
(3)   High Court Appeal S7/2013

Indisputable Corruption was practiced during the trial, and all my attempts to address this has been ignored and any attempts to  present the truth with subpoenas denied.
What The Attorney Generals office did when I exposed this form of corruption will shock all.
The evidence that is possible to disclose/source today with the technology will not only prove what happened in my case, it is capable of exposing rather simply where and how long this form of corruption has been present in our Court System.
All attempt and pleas to allow such evidence has been denied by both the Appeal Court and high Court, no where has either admitted the evidence that is immortalised in the transcripts, (ref attachment)  
I say to all Australian’s both Nicholas and Sackar are guilty together proof Undeniable where they together acknowledged the illegal changing of the transcripts.
Read for your self.
To date both courts bluntly refuse to raise the issues , I realised that as a self litigant we were denied justice by both appeal bodies, not one word did anyone ask Mr J Sackar or Judge R Nicholas, one question regarding the obvious corruption.
No acknowledgement or response by Mr Sackar or Nicholas.
What is unbelievable the corruption is obvious and the technology to day so precise,
It is unbelievable that they refused the right to expose, something so serious it may have affected many hundreds of people, even thousands, I know the changes in my case were unbelievable and will disgust every fibre of the law.

!           As is documented can confirm I refused the use of ComputerReporters from day one, it was presented as a sourced service and need both to approve their use, I did not.
2          We initially realised as soon as Judge Nicholas replaced our allotted Judge, Mr J Sackar was immediately appointed chief prosecutor for the CBA
3          We waited for a disclosure as we were aware through a legal journal they had bought cattle together.
4          A hearing was allocated to address any apprehended bias, such a disgraceful and deceitful response did we receive.
5          As the transcripts will show that day, yes Mr Sackar gave a fraudulent account in an unsigned affidavit that was indisputably fraudulent, to date both courts have refused any mention.
6          I had a copy of a company called Denman Chambers Pty Ltd, unbelievably all three McCulloch/k Mr J Sackar and Judge Nicholas offered not one word in admission regarding Denman chambers, on that day 10th September all three, Mr.J Sackar, Mr.M.McCulloch/k and Judge Nicholas owned a company I believe worth Million in Selborn Chambers  Pty Ltd where they had offices next to each other in the building, not one word did they disclose even after being asked, and had a hearing.
7          WE realised why they were so corrupt as Labor officials had removed the Companies registration, please read the attachment, 
8          This is so easy to disclose again the Appeal Court and High Court refused us any subpoenas to have the truth be known, please read attachment, its not all but will help expose the magnitude of the corruption we had working against us.
9          I told the High Court of the magnitude of the evidence we have and how we could with a few subpoenas’ be able to give a full account of something so corrupt for Australia the truth must be known to all Australia.
10        Our case would have to be the first in Australian History, where all the Joint Tendered Bundle was removed during the trial and replaced with a modified Bank Joint Tendered bundle.
11        This was done so the CBA could include the MFI’s and remove 8 MF’s most of which were proven fraudulent, all presented by Mr J Sackar, such a corrupt man I have yet to met,
12.Please allow the use of Subpoenas’ to display what really occurred and what the truth is.
13        By closing Shaw McDonald and ComputerReporters a cover up already in progress.
14        Please refer to the other attachment for more detail, or contact the writer if you can help. Or seek more detail.

Best Regards,              Anthony George Bakarich.

No comments:

Post a Comment