To All Australian.
This is indisputable evidence showing how corrupt Judge
Nicholas and Mr J Sackar were in our case.
in Judge J Sackar and Judge R. Nicholas
I was involved with the two in the case 5840/92
(1)
Initial hearing 5840/92 followed by two Appeals
(2)
Appeal Court 40442/05
(3)
High Court Appeal S7/2013
Indisputable Corruption was practiced during the trial, and
all my attempts to address this has been ignored and any attempts to present the truth with subpoenas denied.
What The Attorney Generals office did when I exposed this
form of corruption will shock all.
The evidence that is possible to disclose/source today with
the technology will not only prove what happened in my case, it is capable of
exposing rather simply where and how long this form of corruption has been
present in our Court System.
All attempt and pleas to allow such evidence has been denied
by both the Appeal Court and high Court, no where has either admitted the
evidence that is immortalised in the transcripts, (ref attachment)
I say to all Australian’s both Nicholas and
Sackar are guilty together proof Undeniable where they together acknowledged
the illegal changing of the transcripts.
Read for your self.
To date both
courts bluntly refuse to raise the issues , I realised that as a self litigant
we were denied justice by both appeal bodies, not one word did anyone ask Mr J
Sackar or Judge R Nicholas, one question regarding the obvious corruption.
No acknowledgement
or response by Mr Sackar or Nicholas.
What is unbelievable the corruption is obvious and the
technology to day so precise,
It is unbelievable that they refused the right to expose,
something so serious it may have affected many hundreds of people, even
thousands, I know the changes in my case were unbelievable and will disgust
every fibre of the law.
! As is
documented can confirm I refused the use of ComputerReporters from day one, it
was presented as a sourced service and need both to approve their use, I did
not.
2 We initially
realised as soon as Judge Nicholas replaced our allotted Judge, Mr J Sackar was
immediately appointed chief prosecutor for the CBA
3 We waited
for a disclosure as we were aware through a legal journal they had bought
cattle together.
4 A hearing
was allocated to address any apprehended bias, such a disgraceful and deceitful
response did we receive.
5 As the
transcripts will show that day, yes Mr Sackar gave a fraudulent account in an
unsigned affidavit that was indisputably fraudulent, to date both courts have
refused any mention.
6 I had a copy
of a company called Denman Chambers Pty Ltd, unbelievably all three McCulloch/k
Mr J Sackar and Judge Nicholas offered not one word in admission regarding
Denman chambers, on that day 10th September all three, Mr.J Sackar,
Mr.M.McCulloch/k and Judge Nicholas owned a company I believe worth Million in
Selborn Chambers Pty Ltd where they had
offices next to each other in the building, not one word did they disclose even
after being asked, and had a hearing.
7 WE realised
why they were so corrupt as Labor officials had removed the Companies
registration, please read the attachment,
8 This is so
easy to disclose again the Appeal Court and High Court refused us any subpoenas
to have the truth be known, please read attachment, its not all but will help
expose the magnitude of the corruption we had working against us.
9 I told the
High Court of the magnitude of the evidence we have and how we could with a few
subpoenas’ be able to give a full account of something so corrupt for Australia
the truth must be known to all Australia.
10 Our case
would have to be the first in Australian History, where all the Joint Tendered
Bundle was removed during the trial and replaced with a modified Bank Joint
Tendered bundle.
11 This was done
so the CBA could include the MFI’s and remove 8 MF’s most of which were proven
fraudulent, all presented by Mr J Sackar, such a corrupt man I have yet to met,
12.Please allow the use of Subpoenas’ to display what really
occurred and what the truth is.
13 By closing
Shaw McDonald and ComputerReporters a cover up already in progress.
14 Please refer
to the other attachment for more detail, or contact the writer if you can help.
Or seek more detail.
Best Regards, Anthony
George Bakarich.
No comments:
Post a Comment