Letter to Attorney General

Trial 5840/92 then, 25403/92, trial number changed without notice?                                               Then Appeal case 40442/05. High Court S7/2013

Email:  to  Public Smith's Office Email   Office@smith.minister.nsw.gov.au 

 CC attorney@ag.gov.au  now Australia. / world Media -notification

Minister Smith,

In reply to a question raised, what is it that I am asking of The State/ Federal Attorney Generals in regards to the corruption in a case I have against The Commonwealth Bank.

My case is simple in that it is riddled with corruption by Mr J Sackar (now a Judge) and Justice Nicholas. This corruption can be simply exposed by allowing a few subpoenas, these have been denied to even be mentioned by both the Appeal Court and The High Court, I begged them both to allow me to source the technology available today to expose the truth.

I have made statements of how the transcripts are not a true account of the trial, many accounts have been totally changed and/or altered not representing what took place in court, and the Joint Tendered Bundle was changed and lodged in court after the trial had concluded removing the lodged tendered bundles. These are facts proven undeniably to the Judges.

The FBI in America has two tools that can expose the truth they can deliver undeniable evidence, of the fraud and criminal acts. Only the courts deny me this opportunity

T0:-       (1) That Investigation of the hard drive used by Computer Reporters on those days in court be performed by recognized forensics, they can now with their knowledge expose all changes made to the hard drive even without the original computer and bias as was previously required to obtain such knowledge, this is why the closure of two corrupt identities after I advised them of the new technology, they can be exposed at any time.

            (2) Contract sworn witnessed by Mrs. R. Garland of Mrs. M. Bakarich signing can be exposed as also fraudulent as the technology available in biro dating can show we were all together in Mr. M. Newton’s office as Mrs.R.Garland was not present when we signed those.

There are numerous changes that I can direct forensics to corruption within the transcripts.

What I seek is to be allowed to source this evidence and deliver to court to expose a corrupt system that has been working in our legal system, obviously for some time.

The corruption I noticed from day one after gaining the transcripts, a transcript company I refused to agree to use. When I advised the courts of my knowledge of the corruption within the transcripts concerning Shaw McDonald and ComputerReporters I was later advised that both these parties involved were closed. This was only months after bringing their corruption to notice, and that it was impossible to deny their guilt both multi million dollar enterprises

(1)    ComputerReporters Pty Ltd        (2)   The CBA’s in house legal attorneys of Shaw McDonald

My request is simple allow me the few subpoena’s  to make this evidence available today by forensics regarding my case so the truth may then be ruled on, allow the truth to be known. These criminals have been protected from being exposed in both The Appeal and High Court, Both refuse to acknowledge all mention of the crimes I have exposed.

There are so many issues of corruption and changing of the transcripts I have already produced in evidence to the court. This evidence clearly shows Mr Sackar changing the transcripts without permission which was even acknowledged by Judge Nicholas only he elected to change the topic and refused to address the crime at the time, or in his deliberation. He also failed to address or even mention the three fraudulent affidavits by CBA bank managers in Fitgura, Newton and, Mr J Irwin. Along with their evidence some 6 MFI’s all notably missing from the evidence but Judge Nicholas ignored this and does go to some effort to acknowledge how truthful Mrs R Garland evidence appeared. This truth can be unquestionably proven to be another lie produced to the court with the use of a subpoena. Our signing the courts insists on and they all ignore the signing of specific conditions by the CBA, having Justice Santo ordering Mr Sackar to produce orders or pay the penalty not one order did they produce, actually Mr Sackar told Judge Santo he could not make him produce. No orders did he produce as most claimed did not exist.

Then there is the Apprehended bias regarding Nicholas, Sackar and McCullock/h. The three on the day of the trial had chambers in their business Denman Chambers Pty Ltd next to each other doing Millions of dollars of business together not one word did they disclose. I had asked my legal team to question their working on the same case a hearing was on the 10^th of September 2003 to discuss such issues only I did not make my legal team aware of the registration of Denman Chambers Pty Ltd and its registration addresses at Level 6 Selbourn Chambers Pty Ltd and The Jewish mosque in Elizabeth street.  A business worth millions and the hiding and denial of this is a disgrace, as the Labor party removed the records for Denman Chambers Pty Ltd. My legal team believe it never existed and all Sackar, Nicholas and McCulloch/k made no mention at the hearing. My question to Bernie Coles was would happen to them if I could prove they were lying he said they would be deregistered. Mr Brenton Banfield (after I produced the company registration) could not believe this fact so he called the state office and was informed they had removed the registration for the security of Judge Nicholas . To date not a mention even after our apprehended bias claim in the Appeal and High Court ????

To date no response by either the Appeal Court or the High Court regarding on apprehended bias and the relationship between Sackar, Nicholas and McCulloch/k, the only disclosure to date was a fraudulent account tendered by Mr J Sackar to orders from the Appeal Court that a substantial account of apprehended bias be produced. Lies and deceit only produced in Mr Sackar’s Affidavit, not a mention by the courts.

With the subpoena’s all the truth above plus so much more will be known, I was present and can recall most of what happened. I assure everyone the truth will shock all the legal world and ask how long has such contempt been in use in the courts NSW Australia, or for that matter other states and who else has suffered such injustice and been treated unjustly?

The CBA has applied to bankrupt me now and please allow a stay on this until subpoena’s if granted have delivered the truth never has my memory failed me. Nor has it here.

I have started a Blog and will be posting on it most of the events concerning my experience should you wish to look further at the evidence refer to

URL :-   http://australiancourtcorruption.blogspot.com.au/    

I will be adding over Christmas all I can, in seeking justice. I am hoping world notification will help my plight for Justice as it will result in most of Australia being made aware of the unjust treatment I have received by the NSW legal process. Please ask and I will explain how they were able to get away with it, to now detect and expose such corruption, is simple.

The High Court advised me even though my case has never been heard to forget it “I had lost”. As though my life is only a game to her I asked that she relay a letter to the High Court Judges as they have seriously erred ref letter, reply Blog  (X) ???? nothing regarding the corruption and the Apprehended bias has be heard how could they rule. She refused.

I was advised by politicians this corruption was due to the CBA being one of the largest donators to advertising for the Labor political party. I believe Mr Sackar’s actions gave reason to why he was still sworn in as a Judge by The Labor party whilst my criminal charges were issued in court exposing his criminal acts. So much for waiting to learn the whole truth or believing it was ever going to be heard  ????

Please Insist that the subpoenas be allowed and let the truth speak for itself. I believe the truth is so devastating it is why subpoenas especially for the hard drive have been denied.

Also what needs to be asked which Honest person in Australia would refuse the truth from been known with only issuing a few subpoenas, ????  OR order a retrial. “All unbelievable”.

Please help in any way you can our Australian Justice system, it needs your help now, as failure to stop it now will allow this criminal element within our legal system believing they are the norm and untouchable. Forget any honest people these crimes have influenced.

Best Regards to all honest Australian’s.                                       Anthony George Bakarich.